This spring, I am teaching a seminary course, Survey of World Literature, in which we will identify and enjoy works by different authors worldwide. I wish, however, that we had time to take this course to the next level as a Comparative study of world literature. In a Comparative course, we would compare the different national literature with each other in order to bring out, not only the national character of each, but also their unifying, human or contemporaneous character.

Its most fruitful method is comparing translations with their originals, or contemporary translations of a single work in various languages, comparing the interpretation and treatment of similar subjects and themes by the various literatures, or comparing indigenous literary forms with borrowed ones.

In addition, in a Comparative course, we would investigate the historical connections between different literatures to find out when, at what points, and why they influence each other and what they give and take. How were these works translated? How were these translations received—what further effect did they have, and what writers appeared to establish a conversation between the literature? What eyes did the different literatures see and judge one another?

Goethe’s influence in Comparative Study in World Literature

Should different nations inform themselves about world literature and the other works in existence? Goethe was possibly the first writer to consider world literature: his acknowledgment of England in the translation of Ossian in Werther; his acknowledgment to Italy in the translation of Benvenuto Cellini; to France in his translation of Diderot’s Essay on Painting; Goethe speaks of Nordic Classicism in Hakon Jarl and Greek tragedy in Baldur’s Death,

 “One lives with those who are alive” (Goethe and World Literature, 1949, 46).

In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, our nation was primarily aware of the works available translated into English. Longfellow did this. He brought the German and French language and literature to the United States in the mid-nineteenth century through his translations and tenure as the Smith Professor of Modern Languages at Bowdoin College, Harvard University. Now, with access to the World Wide Web, works of world literature are available to us through many translations.

Biblical Worldview in Comparative Literature

This seminary course aims to look at World Literature, such as the writings of Homer and Shakespeare, and compare them with a Biblical worldview. What is the Biblical worldview?

I have recently been applying the tenets of Comparative study to Scripture. We are privileged to read the Scriptures in English translations from the original Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic languages of the Scriptures. The writers of our Scriptures were from different parts of the world, cultures, languages, and world views—but their works are still unifying. The translators had to keep the original meaning considering that the Hebrew language has no fewer than 10,000 words as compared to the English language, which has nearly 1,000,000 words (at the time of the first English translation, the Tyndale Bible was translated into Middle English which consisted of about 50,000 words)-the Greek speech with 200,000?

We must consider divine inspiration as a large part of the answer. One must consider that the Old Testament was originally written in Hebrew and then translated to Greek (possibly using the Septuagint) and then English for our purposes. Therefore, as we look at the grammatical structure of the Old Testament, we need to consider three different languages and grammatical structures just in the interpretation: Hebrew to Greek to English. Wow!

Hebrew was a forgotten language for one hundred years before the coming of Jesus. Therefore, other than some scholars, the Jews no longer knew Hebrew. The other citizens spoke a derivative of Hebrew known as Aramaic. Scriptures were read in the synagogues in Hebrew and had to be translated into Aramaic for the listeners. One danger in this oral translation was to avoid adding human feelings and actions to God. This dynamic continues to be true in translation from Hebrew to the Modern languages.

On the other hand, the New Testament was written in Greek and Aramaic. In the Gospels, John presented Christianity to the Greek world, not the Jewish world, so he had to keep these grammatical structures in mind. John writes: “In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God (1:1)”. In Greek, this Word is Logos defined as 1. “a word, uttered by a living voice, embodies a concept or idea; 2. The sayings of God. “The Greeks were familiar with the idea of the Word, or Logos, from around 560 B.C. so that John could use this concept. Now, in translating the Greek words of John to English, what does the translator do with Word? As we know, it stays the same, with no change. One needs to refer to the Greek Lexicon or consult a Bible scholar to know that this refers to Jesus. According to this text’s “tense “, Jesus has existed since the beginning of time.

Historical Connections in Comparative Study

Secondly, in a Comparative study, we consider the historical connections between the different writings. When, at what points, and how have they influenced each other? How were these works translated? How are these translations received—what further effect do they continue to have? What writers appeared to establish a conversation between their narratives? What eyes did the different literatures see and judge one another?

Thank you, Goethe, for introducing us to the concept of comparing literature between cultures. We are richer for it.

Work Cited

Fritz Strich. Goethe and World Literature. Kessinger Publishing, 2008.